I simply stated I have heard that arguement and it strikes me a plausible, it is quite interesting that Botnst in the interim has proposed a remarkably similar theory/opinion and you've skipped over his response with nary a comment in an attempt to find something to mischaracterize and squeal about in mine! Nothing like a little drama, huh?

They are not normal, the biological imperative to reproduce and generate mutation defines normal in this universe, get over it!

The State through its authority has at times and places decided it was in the public interest to prevent through castration deviant mutations from passing that mutation to offspring, again get over it!

Correlation? Chicken vs. egg? Psychological malfunction or biological sexual malfunction, which one begets the other, I don't know and neither do you!

By the way, until you offer something more than an unsupported assertion your claim as to the "high percentage of homosexuals" that have reproduced is an opinion to which you are entitled to believe and everyone else is entitled to dis-believe.

The issue is obviously personal to you, good luck with it!

PS You'll note I never stated I purported my comments to be a "scientific approach" either!