Quote:
Originally Posted by Killer
I simply stated I have heard that arguement and it strikes me a plausible, it is quite interesting that Botnst in the interim has proposed a remarkably similar theory/opinion and you've skipped over his response with nary a comment in an attempt to find something to mischaracterize and squeal about in mine!
They are not normal, the biological imperative to reproduce and generate mutation defines normal in this universe, get over it!
|
I saw nothing in Botnst's post which cast moral aspersions on homosexuals, whereas yours was filled with them. Hence its plausability depends upon a moral judgment whereby homosexuals have more moral weaknesses than heterosexuals.
Normal has huge variations amongst species. Some species have a substantial contingent of homosexuals, others don't. Some of our primate relatives have lots of 'deviants', others don't.