Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash
Not sure the point is that obvious but what ever. I still do not see the point of the thread. One act involves consenting adults the others do not.
So what is the purpose of linking the two together in a thread? The fact that something genetic or not does not dictate legality or not.
|
How does looking at naked pictures of infants involve consent? I believe the point is that once this "ingrained" and not learned is on solid footing then a whole host of other "ingrained" behavior is now closer to having a legit reason for otherwise inexcusable actions.