Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash
Not sure the point is that obvious but what ever. I still do not see the point of the thread. One act involves consenting adults the others do not.
So what is the purpose of linking the two together in a thread? The fact that something genetic or not does not dictate legality or not.
|
Did you read the article? Because it is quite clear that the facts of the circumstance link homosexuality with pedophilia not the thread about the circumstance! What is your purpose of attempting to delink these two co-joined facts of this circumstance?
Why are you trying to interject the subjectivity of "legalities" when as far as I can see no one has questioned whether sex with infants should or should not be "legal"?
Why shouldn't people view your own portrayed intolerance of pedophilic inclination as evidence of repressed latent pedophilic inclinations just as homosexuals and their advocates view the portrayed intolerance of homosexual inclination as evidence of repressed latent homosexual inclinations?