Originally Posted by Killer

Can't differentiate between inclination and action"? Anybody can want anything as much as they'd like, but they can not have anything or everything they want.

The article is clear there is no evidence that Brinkin acted to violate the rights of any other except in the most tangental of reasoning that consumers of kiddie porn by the demand that they create are somehow complicit in the abuse of children. Don't think anybody in the discussion has suggested that he did, or should be able to.