Thread: Dumb Question-
View Single Post
  #59  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:15 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by cullennewsom View Post
Ah, I don't share that belief.

I see, you're trying to rationalize our presence there with the let-us-be-big-brother-to-the-world argument. I don't buy it. We're there for resources, either to steal them, or to keep someone else from stealing them.
I don't agree that this was the reason for our involvement in Afghanistan, BUT, it would be a reason to stay involved long term.

Mining in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

quote from the link- "Afghanistan's resources could make it the richest mining region on earth"

I totally agreed with the toppling of the Taliban from a perspective of the obvious terror threat and just the general evil nature of the Taliban anyway, and so far have been a supporter of the US presence in Afghanistan, as it was a job worth doing.

Since our involvement though, the mining riches of that region have been more clearly mapped and estimated.

This is a real possibility for the basis of a strong, wealthy Afghan nation based on mining activities, similar to Saudi Arabia with oil fields.

That could potentially be an attraction for either India of Pakistan now that I read more deeply into it, so maybe thats one of the arguements in the book?
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote