Originally Posted by Air&Road

I'm still must not be making my point clear David.

It's not about the particular amendment they voted on. It's not about whether or not a candidate or party member goes along or applies that part of the platform or not..

My point is that the person listening to the verbal voting IGNORED what he heard and confirmed the amendment anyway even though it clearly did not get the required 2/3 majority for confirmation.

He screwed the people who were against confirmation by confirming even though it did NOT recieve the required 2/3 majority. He SCREWED many of his OWN party members by violating the party rules and doing as he pleased instead of honoring the voting of the group.