Quote:
Originally Posted by raymr
RomneyCare is at the state level. He wants it to stay at the state level and not national. The federal ObamaCare would subsidize poor states like Arkansas, where RomneyCare would make them be self supporting somehow. I don't know which is better/fairer.
|
So, by staying on a state level as opposed to a federal level, RomneyCare averted the subsidy of the poor issue that you discuss above? Why didn't RomneyCare subsidize poorer sections of Massachusetts? Did RomneyCare make those poorer sections of the state self-supporting?