Originally Posted by MS Fowler

I get your "attack"

So you admit no flaws in the theories of MMGW? 1. Theories are tentative and need to be adjusted or discarded in response and only in response to peer reviewed scientific evidence Its a confirmed, ironclad FACT to you? No, see 1 above. However the data (some of the most massively independently peer reviewed and duplicated in the history of science) appears to very strongly point toward ACC You are not troubled by any of the data or stories of how it was purposefully manipulated for political purposes? Yes. and the scientist who did this (reacting in frustration -no excuse- to the constant denial being perpetrated in the media by non science based commercial/ -the real- political interests) was duly tarred and feathered by his peers.


No healthy skepticism allowed? Scientific evidence based, yes. Not only allowed but essential to the scientific process. Coming from blowhard, oil money owned, creationist, "legitimate rape" politicians , not so much.