View Single Post
  #17  
Old 12-11-2012, 03:21 PM
retmil46's Avatar
retmil46 retmil46 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012 View Post
A buddy on another site is a booster for life of the integral fast reactor (IFR) for which there is apparently no other available suitable coolant/energy transfer medium than liquid sodium. I'll admit it's an attractive solution in many ways - it could consume much of waste nuclear materials currently in haphazard storage and is allegedly meltdown-proof. The downside from what I can gather is that so far practically all of them have suffered debilitating sodium fires. What could go wrong? Liquid sodium separated from water by a thin metal membrane? Oh boy. Maybe if the sodium could heat another medium which is then transferred to the water/steam component - sort of a buffer step - might be more reliable.
Yep. Navy tried a liquid sodium cooled reactor on the original USS Seawolf (attack sub) back in the late 50's. Decided it wasn't a good idea for pretty much the same reasons.
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel

Mitchell Oates
Mooresville, NC
'87 300D 212K miles
'87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club
Reply With Quote