Originally Posted by dropnosky

needlessly obnoxious, but I guess thats all you can be.

Me and my kind has been pushing for some modification of gun law since things like columbine. At the time, me and my kind said more school shootings would take place, lets do something about the gun laws in place.
Just in case you are unfamiliar with the concept of time, that was before the latest dozen tragedies, including this one.
I think a couple thousand reasonable plans have been proposed well before now, but every single one is apparently too much for those deeply wedded to their perceived 2nd amendment rights.

I think a lack of sufficient vision is demonstrated by someone who stands back and scoffs at any plan of any kind, and does nothing. Im not sure when proactive became the same as do nothing, but apparently for you, its a method that holds merit.

Shoulder fired missles? sure, thats a definite possibility, but as you state, its pretty hard to protect against that, so with your logic, because all methods of attack cannot be protected against, NO methods of attack should be protected against. Well, in the real world, that doesn't work.