Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
........thereby rendering anything you do to curtail handguns to be deemed ineffective..........
Of course you do. The reason is that you want to derail the thread to support your position regarding handguns.
For your information, the thread is regarding the shooting in CT. To further refresh your memory, those folks were killed by one deranged man who did not own a handgun, a rifle, or a shotgun.
Next.  |
No he didn't, and whats your point?
He died with two handguns and a rifle. Whether or not he owned them is preposterously unrelated to the fact that if legislation existed that prevented his MOTHER from owning them, he wouldn't have had the kind of access to such dangerous tools that he actually did have.
Whoever owned the dam things, they were legally owned, as has been the vast majority of weapons used in mass killings. Who cares if the killers themselves actually owned the weapons or not? The law abiding citizens they stole them from would be affected by legislation, which would impact availability.