Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road
You mean save the BUILDING. The Church is NOT the building, it is supposed to be the people, you know the religious ones that you loathe so much. They can worship under a tree or anywhere. They don't need a building.
I do agree about saving some of the beautiful old buildings, (the Duomo in Milan comes to mind) albeit NOT with taxpayers money.
|
Sometimes in order to preserve our history, we have to spend tax dollars. Much of what is right with our society has root in religion, and the buildings are a physical manifestation of the people and ideas.
The architecture of some of these edifices is much closer to God than what goes on inside the building.
If our religions were not perverted in much the same way as our governments, then I would not be against them. All too often, people in positions of power within the church use that power in ways which is harmful and destructive.... contrary to their own teachings.
Then there are some who are so rigid in their interpretation of their religion that they would gladly exclude all who do not share their narrow view. They gladly condemn and insult and rant like lunatics. (one of those is a member)
All in all, I see the damages inflicted by religions overshadowing the benefits.
Maybe it would be better if people started worshiping under trees again...
