Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
Look up the definition of "infringe". Everything you propose infringes on the right to keep and bear arms. What you consider "adjustments" are actually infringements.
|
I believe every right we have has certain limitations. The rights are still there.
i just want the weapons tracked from person to person with a title of ownership. I want all weapons not in use to be secured in a certified safe. If your gun is used in the commission of a crime you better have a dam goo reason why it is no longer in your possession. If your safe was not blown open or you were not mugged, well, you just might be facing some serious problems.
If these things infringe on your rights... oh well. I think the fact that any moron can get a gun with out so much as a how do you do infringes on my right to freedom and happiness.
Most of the so called solutions here are to go into effect once the walls gave been breached and there is no fall back position. That's all fine and dandy. The problem I see with all this is no one bothered to build the wall. Right now there are bunch of stick out there that any one can walk through. No one is trying top limit or prevent the bad guys from continuing to obtain weapons. No one is talking about a requirement for a back ground check for any weapon sold. Making sure weapons are secure.... etc.
By the time the gunman is in the building the risk of someone getting hurt increases exponentially. How about we try and prevent the guy from getting a gun in the first place?