So, after nearly 900 posts we have no resolution.

One side wants to just ignore the Constitutional language regarding infringement, admits that laws will not the law-breakers but want "something" to be done. I'd have to call that an emotional response to the tragedy in CT.

The other side is characterized as not caring about the murder of innocents, and needing guns to replace their childhood security blankets.

Intransigence on both sides. Matters of principle on both sides.
How do you construct a compromise between two such parties?

__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags