Quote:
Originally Posted by dropnosky
You haven't "proven" any points Mr. Carlton, aside from a cattyness and peevishness in conversation similar to a teenage girl going through puberty, sure. Thats been proven time and again, old news.
You have said that CT has restrictive handgun laws, yes, and you have also pointed out as we know, that the majority of the people killed was with an automatic rifle. The laws on the books may seem overly restrictive to you, however, I do not consider them restrictive in the least if either of these weapons were-
1- available in the first place
2- if available, not secured properly
3- accessible by a known potential problem.
Your restrictive CT handgun laws require an application with 70 buck fee, 8 weeks of waiting for approval more or less, and you gotta take a handgun course, the NRA's pistol course. The sad part, is that CT law IS pretty restrictive compared to other parts of the country, which is the core issue here.
|
You've proven to be a person who refuses to see the facts as presented to you. Time and again we show you that the laws in existence today don't make any dent in the gun violence, either because they are not enforced or because they are ignored via illegal weapons.
CT's restrictive handgun laws have done nothing to prevent violence with a weapon. The carnage occured right in CT.
So, just continue onward with your blather regarding more laws and more restrictions on guns. Anyone with an ounce of brain cells knows that it won't make a damn bit of difference in the violence prevalent in society today.
And, yes, talking to you is like talking to a wall...........I think I need my own head examined for continuing with it.