Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel
Not by a long shot.
But I believe there are more of us who like guns, don't want to see stupid and ineffective legislation, and yet are still concerned with the over abundance of weapons in our society
Too many idiots have guns. Taking them away from everybody to get them away from the idiots would suck. Leaving them in the hands of the idiots sucks too....
Unfortunately for all of us on either side of the debate, there is no meaningful discussion about the future.
We have zealots screaming 'Shall not be infringed' on one side.... and zealots who want to ban anything that is black and scary looking on the other...
People who don't even understand what they are trying to ban are as bad as people who assume that their extremely narrow interpretation of a 250 year old document is the only valid interpretation.
|
A 230+ yo document, as the basis for our own country's existance, is nothing to take lightly.
Consider...how many nice homes have you seen around your neighborhood...and I'm talking about nice OLD homes. Ones with SOLID FOUNDATIONS and incorporating proper architectural designs and features.
There are some folks think those buildings are out of code, stodgy and drafty...nothing anyone in their "right mind" would want to have in a newer neighborhood. Hell, maybe the owner of that old home drives an old, smelly diesel car that just pollutes the landscape.
See where this is going?
Those old homes and cars are still around, providing comfort to those that UNDERSTAND what a good foundation brings to everything made by man, BECAUSE THEY WERE BUILT ON GOOD FOUNDATIONS TO BEGIN WITH.
Contracts only stand up when the words are based on solid principles and standards...not on hip-hop ebonics, "flavor-of-the-craze" mantras and trash-talking PC-euphemisms that mask what's really trying to happen.
Change/upgrade the wording of the COTUS?
Go out and get a copy of "Black's Law Dictionary" to just
understand what you're trying to change.
Can't do that much?
Then shelve the project.
WORD. . . . . . . . . . (Now, why the h3ll did I just "say" that?) 
