Well, Suginami, my take as I wrote above, is that if I'm not getting at least two sides of the story, then I'm getting no story. I find it hard to be objective when (always) only hearing one side of the story or chronology. In other words, it's kind of pointless to comment with any definitive value - when you have no idea what the complete story is - nor the ryhme or reason as to why things are the way they are, or how things got to be how they are - all according to how the author claims things are.

For example; there is another often story telling poster here that only states his spin on his often disasterous familia life history here on OD regards to previous family and life past. There's absolutely no evidence to ever warrant taking his side on almost everything that particular poster writes - when put in the context of never knowing what the opposition would have to say about the matter here.

Although it sometimes makes for good reading, I often wonder why someone (anyone) would disclose some of what they write here - regards private, familia goings on, and what they are possibly expecting as reactions/advice, on only 50% or less from the story's players and chronology? Doesn't make a lot of sense to me - all things considered.

__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert