His argument that capitalist private property is not part of the Bible seems tight to me. The part about 'not enforcing' those laws seems odd and forced upon the text. In fact his main argument in defense of this part is that the law applied to rulers as well which in no way bears on the issue of whether the law should be enforced or not. I can only imagine that he's trying to avoid issue of whether these biblical economic ideas should become enforceable parts of current law. Apparently he thinks not.

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13