Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3
why did you not underline "several hundred years"? You did not prove me wrong, you actually reinforced what I said.
|
I proved you wrong quite well. You've just changed what you said. Your earlier post makes it quite apparent to anyone that you were proven wrong.
Quote:
|
The difference is not really an issue of wrong or right, its in what we consider a religious figure of extreme importance. I gather you figure he was a religious figure of extreme importance because he was Jesus Christ.
|
You made a claim, now you're trying to weasel your way out of being corrected by saying that your claim cannot be falsified.
Quote:
|
I figure the same when Christianity became enormously widespread, and as I said, that was not until several hundred years later.
|
Except that's not what you said.
Quote:
|
Id also call a couple hundred years for a man to become a god about right as well, and have it believed widespread.
|
So how many times do you have to be shown that you are 100% wrong when you say this? HOW MANY TIMES!?
Quote:
|
That his immediate followers called him a god and you can refer to stuff they wrote means exactly that, his immediate followers called him a god.
|
I think it'd be better for my blood pressure and my brain cells if I just left you and your ignorance alone. I tried to correct you nicely, then I tried to keep you on topic, now I'm just frustrated because you can't even recognize your own words communicated something different than you meant.
Learn to write. Learn your history. Get the facts straight. Then I'll consider entering this type of conversation with you again. As for now, goodbye.