Quote:
Originally Posted by martureo
8. You had eight different off topic, irrelevent or erroneous statements in this post ALONE. Tell me why I should even bother with addressing your previous statement concerning Jesus identifying himself as deity?
Can you even get through a single post without poor logic, or saying something irrelevant or erroneous?
|
interesting tactics, though surprisingly unrelated to the topic despite all your ridged analysis of what adheres to a topic and what doesn't.
My basic point is that nothing Jesus actually wrote has survived. What we have are third person accounts, years later, most deifying him, most presenting him as the focal point of a new religion. Contemporary non religious accounts are also spotty so we have very little feel for the man, just a mountain of what people
think, and most of that much later.
Take for example Joseph Smith. We have a huge group of people who believe a mountain of nonsense DESPITE blatantly clear contemporary information still floating around in abundance.
Not that Joseph Smith in any way compares to jesus, but we don't really know do we? what if he was a big scam artist? how do you disprove that? Personally I don't think he was, but then again, there is no way to disprove any theory of that kind.