Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3
who mentioned science? I believe I specifically said RELIGIOUS scholars and ALL scholars. And they were wrong.
Three centuries of scholars makes little difference if they all assume the bible is nothing but fact, as ive repeatedly stated to you we do not agree on.
|
And here we go again making really bad assumptions....
Quote:
|
Agreed on most all, but still, are you saying that matthew did not write his own gospel? The same 300 years of religious scholars seem to say that he did, are they wrong in this and right in other things only? or are they only wrong and right when it matches what YOU consider right and wrong?
|
If I'm going to continue to be your tutor I'll be expecting some compensation.
I'm getting a little tired of having to teach you even the basics.
Quote:
|
So Jesus could read but could not write? interesting, such things usually go hand in hand.
|
Um... no they don't.
Quote:
|
The next person I meet who can fluently read characters on a page and discern meaning from them who cannot also recreate the same characters for themselves and know what they mean will be the first unless they have no arms, and the bible seems to say jesus had all his parts. Thanks for agreeing with me that he could probably write.
|
Ugh...
Quote:
|
havent you been spending a good amount of time claiming ive been making many different unrelated arguments? yet now im making the same argument again and again. thanks for finally admitting that.
|
Confusion, conflation and non sequitor... wonderful.
