View Single Post
  #9  
Old 07-27-2013, 09:54 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj67coll View Post
I don't think he should give it back. However not because of this journalist individual. He betrayed it the moment he accepted it when he didn't have the character to decline it as he should have. However his inappropriate acceptance thereof is less relevant than the debasing of the prize itself by the decision of the Nobel committee to award it to him in the first place. Subsequently to that charade the prize itself and anything to do with it is a meaningless farce.

- Peter.
Well said. The appropriate response would have been to inform the nobel committee how much they cheapened such a high honor by using it as a political bargaining tool. Reward people for their actions completed, not for their promises made. Shame on them for lowering the nobel prize to the level of a cracker jack box toy, and shame on Obama for accepting it.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote