Quote:
Originally Posted by pj67coll
I don't think he should give it back. However not because of this journalist individual. He betrayed it the moment he accepted it when he didn't have the character to decline it as he should have. However his inappropriate acceptance thereof is less relevant than the debasing of the prize itself by the decision of the Nobel committee to award it to him in the first place. Subsequently to that charade the prize itself and anything to do with it is a meaningless farce.
- Peter.
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I agree with that, but I take it further. Giving him the prize at the beginning of his reign was pure idiocy. Ha had not had the chance to prove himself worthy of it, and has yet to prove such a thing.
It reminded me of how they made heroes of the astronauts right after selecting them before they had done ANYTHING.
Of course that's how liberals operate. Proven facts are nothing to them. All that count are their ideologies.