
12-06-2013, 11:08 PM
|
|
Mad Scientist
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,598
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillGrissom
I might consider the 120A alternator if I needed to change mine alternator anyway, especially since cheaper than the $150 I paid in 2001 for a NAPA one. I like the stud outputs, which is more reliable than the spade connector on my 85 300D, plus no sense having 2 output spades & wires like the factory design. Otherwise, my battery recharges fine w/ the factory 65 A alternator, so I don't see the necessity.
The headlights should work fine off the battery alone. If too dim, there are probably issues with corroded connectors. I don't see a need to keep up with the glow-plugs while cranking. Indeed, that is silly. A larger alternator would just load the starter motor more while cranking, causing more draw from the battery. It isn't a "perpetual motion" machine. On the same thread, why run the alternator output to the starter? Indeed, it would be nice to disable the alternator while cranking, which I think some car systems do. If your present alternator keeps the battery charged, a bigger one would just risk smoking wires.
|
I wasn't implying any kind of perpetual motion silliness. An alternator that will maintain charging voltage with the glow plugs on is quite nice when your system is set up for after-glow.
__________________
617 swapped Toyota Pickup, 22-24 MPG, 50k miles on swap
|