Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
It's because, like many behaviors, it falls neatly under the "slippery slope" theory of morality.
But you already knew that. What you really meant to say is that you think the argument is obnoxious and without merit and wish it would go away.
I agree that it is obnoxious but I see not evidence that it is without merit. Do you?
|
I have not seen evidence which indicates that there
is merit to that statement, despite hearing it touted it as truth at every convenient opportunity by those who oppose rights for the homosexual crowd.
Has there been a study of people who screw animals to determine if there is a link?
Maybe those people start with hetero sex... would that be evidence that having hetero sex leads to sex with animals?
I bet they all engaged in onanism.... should we add 'bestiality' to 'hairy palms' and 'blindness'..?
