Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash
Did you even read the link you posted? They have attempted with out a shred of evidence to link the two. You just tried to link the two by citing that article as proof.
When the article does not have a single source to back up its claim there is nothing to discredit.
Funny how people think that posting something automatically makes it true.
|
The question is did YOU read it, and did YOU understand the entire scope of the paper?
Since you claim that your education and knowledge is so massively beyond the rest of us, it is quite surprising that IF you read the article, you do not understand a concept called FOOTNOTES. There are almost EIGHTY different references at the bottom of the article.
In the text there are little numbers in brackets that refer to those footnotes which reference almost eighty articles, studies and the like to back up their findings.
SO...... did YOU REALLY read the article? With such a brilliant mind and education to a level that challenges that of Dr. Ben Carson, do you REALLY not know what footnotes are all about?