Quote:
Originally Posted by barry12345
No I do not see the evidence as circumstantial. He will have to produce the source of the product and proof he purchased it there. The flavor in the bottles will be another important piece of evidence. The owner can identify it. . If he refuses to produce them upon employer demand is another issue.
The odds of the owner of the product being at the same place and with usable video coverage occurring where pretty thin but it occurred.
|
Except that this isn't a trial. He doesn't have any burden of proof. Under normal union rules, they'll notify him and he'll come to a meeting with a union rep. He'll spout his story, the rep will back him and that will most likely be the end of it.