Quote:
Originally Posted by barry12345
No I do not see the evidence as circumstantial. He will have to produce the source of the product and proof he purchased it there. The flavor in the bottles will be another important piece of evidence. The owner can identify it. . If he refuses to produce them upon employer demand is another issue.
The odds of the owner of the product being at the same place and with usable video coverage occurring where pretty thin but it occurred.
You might want to consider buying a lotto ticket this week if you normally do not. Remember if it comes in five percent would help me out.  If not you can put me on your **** list. 
|
You overlook the fact that the only two bottles delivered in Pennsylvania were in possession of the USPS employee fencing them at the vape shop who also just happened to be the guy whose route was set up for delivery.....