View Single Post
  #9  
Old 01-28-2015, 06:59 AM
vstech's Avatar
vstech vstech is offline
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
I can't say much that will be constructive / specific for the OM601 but I can say that for the M102 (petrol) engine the difference between the 1.8 and 2.0 version is in the head design and the piston design => the cylinder bore is the same.

The 1.8 M102 has ball topped / convex pistons and a head that suits these protrustions. The 2.0 M102 has flat topped pistons and a different shape to the combustion chamber in the head. I've seen pictures of a M102 2.3 engine that has the convex piston design and combustion shape in the head that is similar to the 1.8 design.

So the message is => if the bore diameters are the same - look carefully at the piston design and combustion chamber shapes. Mercedes also made different displacements by fiddling with the unswept volumes and piston shapes rather than just changing bore sizes
Head and piston design are irrelevant to displacement... If the displacement increased, either bore or stroke had to change.
Certainly, piston and cylinder head design changes effect power and efficiency...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote