hmmm...well there is this 1987 turbo which apparently has 250k on it which I am considering taking the trek to go and see. Not outrageously far, if it is something to consider. Guy said he took care of it very well...

If the 1996/1997 diesel is complete junk, then of course I would consider this car. Like I said, I had a 1998 Turbo for a short period of time, and I liked it. But again, rain/snow/salt were not a big factor when I owned it. And I did hear from people that the same car in a rougher climate would not fare too well in the long run.

As far as fuel economy, are we talking a big difference between 87 turbo and 96/7 diesel sedan? And how about a 1994, 1995 W124 series (sedan). Are they also worth a look?