View Single Post
  #6  
Old 06-13-2016, 11:48 PM
tjts1 tjts1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demothen View Post
Safety standards, build and material costs, and fuel efficiency requirements happened.

This isn't necessarily a bad thing. And it's certainly not limited to Mercedes. Do you like your modern cars to get good mileage, but still have modern conveniences? They need to weigh less. Want to be safer in a crash? They need crumple zones. Want to be able to afford a car? Then it needs to be made from less expensive materials, and fewer of them.

To meet expectations, cars need to be more refined and engineered. Instead of building things heavy and strong, they need to be engineered to use the fewest resources, but those resources need to be just strong enough to do the job.

There was a crash test done a while back between a 50's or 60's piece of detroit iron and it's modern equivalent. Very thought provoking.
This makes no sense at all. There are plenty of reliable cars today, Mercedes is not one of them. MBs had crumple zones going back to the late 60s, ABS and airbags in the late 70s, seat belt pretensioners in the mid 80s etc. Safety is nothing new. Also most modern cars are far heavier than any of our ancient diesel heaps. A modern E350 weighs 3800LBS.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words
Reply With Quote