I did not address my reply to you except in terms of reference, and believe me, it was quite clear who the material was credited to. Thanks for providing the information, but please show the source where you got it from. If you can't, then don't post heresay.

There's a lot of unsubstantiated crap and half-truths on the internet that have to be countered with facts. As Sam Clemens once said "Don't believe anything you read, and only half of what you actually see".

You did not post a reference for the material, or show any alternate or subsequent sources for additional material for or against the material you posted. If anyone posts material on these forums, I feel that they need to be accurate and credible in content and source.

All I ask of anyone is that they be accurate, show their sources, and make an intelligent and informed point backed up by factual material that can be referenced. If you feel that applies to you, then we should have no issue with each other.

However, chemical, biological, nuclear and gas weaponry is serious business, not to be taken lightly, or downplayed by a single source. I have studied weapons of mass destruction, as they are now called, for decades. And I am never underwhelmed by the extents that people will go to develop weapons to injure, maim, kill, or as the inventors of the Gatlin and Maxim rapid fire weapons believed, to end warfare forever. And that applies to the atomic and hydrogen bombs as well.

Remember that information is power, and accurate information is essential to survival.

__________________

Scott Longston
Northern California Wine Country...
"Turbos whistle, grapes wine..."