Quote:
Originally Posted by MB140300SD
On my 01 E320 I have always run 91 and I track every tank of fuel. Several months ago I decided to try running 87 in it. I ran it on 87 for probably 2-3 months, then ran it for about a month or 2 on 91 again. I can tell no different in power and MPG is the same. I am getting anywhere from 25-28mpg with both types of fuel. I have talked to some folks who run these only on premium and others say it is perfectly fine to run them on 87 but you might have lower power and less mileage. But, as I tracked for myself, power seems the same and mileage is identical. Anybody else tracked this and had similar experiences?
|
I own 2 M112s (E320 wagon C320 wagon) and run both on 87 octane. Here's the fuel consumtion logs.
Big Bertha (Mercedes-Benz E320) | Fuelly
The ugly one!!1 (Mercedes-Benz C320) | Fuelly
I tried 91 octane on the c320 initially and switched back and forth a few times between 87 and 91. I saw no difference in FE or acceleration. I also monitored real time ignition timing with my icarsoft i980. On 87 octane it only pulls timing in hot weather (90f+) and full throttle acceleration. In all other situations ignition timing is exactly the same. So I run both cars on 87 octane. The only time I put 91 octane in either is if I'm driving in extremely hot weather through the mountains. Think Tejon pass in August. Or if I'm pulling a trailer with the e320 in hot weather. The other 99% of the time it's 87 octane. The E320 has 181k miles and the previous owner also used 87 octane. The C320 has 170k miles, no idea what the previous owner used. But it was a $1100 car. I doubt he bothered with 91.
EDIT: I also did some 0-60 mph tests with the C320 on 87 and 91 octane in cool weather (50-60f). It ran the same 6.7 sec with both fuels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by christuna
if you're easy on it you will probably be ok.
I would run premium only but then again I have a heavy foot sometimes 
Here's a real time knock test on different fuels on a m113 (not mine):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWl4h-HmExI |
Yeah I saw that video and tried the same test with my Icarsoft on the C320. It didn't pull timing like that on 87. I think he let the engine heat soak at idle for a long time before accelerating in order to get that result. Thats the only way I was able to replicate his result. In fact I can get it to pull timing like that on 91 octane as well if it idles for a couple of minutes. You can predict if it's going to pull timing based on the IAT sensor live data. It can get up into the 150f plus range after a bit of idling. In normal driving IAT hovers around 5-15f above ambient temperature.