Quote:
Originally posted by dculkin
Those darn liberals! (By the way, when did "liberal" become a noun?)
If Jim Baker had been "a liberal", there is no way he would have been punished for taking all that money from his ministry. It is too bad his lawyer didn't tell him that being "a liberal" is a valid defense against criminal charges. Maybe he could have avoided prison.
Someone should tell Bill Clinton that he got off the hook. He might have thought that he was punished, given that a substantial part of his presidency was spent dealing with the most intrusive investigations any public figure has ever endured, defending an impeachment trial, having his license to practice law suspended, incurring millions of dollars in legal fees, paying a large settlement to Paula Jones, etc., etc. He might be relieved to know that he got off the hook. Given the amount of bogus crap that was thrown at him, his getting off the hook would not have been the correct result, but it would have been closer to the correct result than what actually happened.
|
Jim Baker deserved everything that he got. Idiot.
Well, at least ol' Bill was a far more entertaining President than George W.! Blow jobs in the Oval Office, fun games like "hide the cigar", accusations of rape, accusations of real estate fraud, admitting to smoking pot (but not inhaling!
hahaha)....
George W.'s "Iraq scandal" just isn't quite as soap-opera worthy, is it?
Mike