I can certainly understand and appreciate the sentiment behind the claim that it is wrong. But it is very unclear to me why it is wrong (if it is wrong at all). We let people cut off parts of their anatomy every day and throw those parts away (cosmetic surgery) so it can't just be that. Is it wrong because there was a sexual component to it? (I have no clue as to what the sexual component was, it was mentioned in the news stories).
Botnst seemed to think there was a clear religious argument against it. I don't know what this might be. Ok, it might be that it is wrong to kill someone but the removal and consumption of part of someone's anatomy doesn't seem to be covered by that rule. In fact some religions regularly remove parts of that organ and just throw them away.

It is extremely difficult for me to imagine what might have been going through the killers mind, let alone the victim's mind.

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13