|
maybe we should institute line-item taxation, along the lines of line-item veto. voting records would be pretty clear then eh?
We could institute a Kantian categorical imperitive test, then have at it (can you in good faith and with full understanding of the consequences wish that everyone would come to the same decision as you on this?):
Can you will that your action of not paying the tax specifically limited to keeping the military's don't ask don't tell like its fooling anyone anyway get over it it doesnt matter morale my a$$ plenty of good gays in history law would become a universal law?
Can you will that your action of not paying the tax specifically limited to spending on the maintenance of an anti-castro radio station that broadcasts at great expense daily across 90 miles of water to Cuba where noone listens or gives a crap take a damn hint it's been running without any impact whatsoever for so many years it's insane and he's about to die anyway give it a rest already Kennedy was president last time he misbehaved but at least they got to hear about elian gonzales why did we try to keep that kid anyway? would become a universal law?
Can you will that your action of not paying the tax specifically limited to requiring pharmaceutical companies to include 900 disclaimers in their "ask your doctor about X" or now the new trend of having no disclaimer at all due to the lack of any actual claim nice legal loophole there good thing they are getting around the big $$ spent on those important consumer protections who asks their damn doctor for a specific drug anyway its their job to tell you what you need how anoying for doctors when 'hey doc, should I take dexohematose? No, dumbass that is for hemopheliac diabetics after menopause not you teen age boy comercials would become a universal law?
Ok, that wouldn't work. but it was fun to write.
|