View Single Post
  #12  
Old 01-03-2004, 08:36 PM
BoostnBenz's Avatar
BoostnBenz BoostnBenz is offline
Benötigt Mehr Druck!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,855
An 85 300D would be better for maintenance & parts hands down. Parts for the W123s are so much cheaper than for the W124s, also the W124s have known to break parts shortly after replacing them in cycles where as the W123 typically is a fix every 25years or so. Most people looking into the mid 90s 300Ds wouldn't be very appealed to the mid 80s 300Ds as they don't have "as much power." Yes they have 125hp but I believe they are a bit heavier, they also get upper 20s for average all around mileage versus the 30s the 87+ would get (because of aerodynamic drag and gearing), and they don't have all the nifty features (things to break) like the newer ones do.
__________________
Jeff M.
Mercedes W123 DIY pages are now located here.
1983 / 1984 300D Sold
2000 CLK430 Cabriolet ~58k Sold
2005 Avalanche 4x4 ~66k
Reply With Quote