B.--high marks for changing the subject, again.

You said that the article cited, mentioning millions worldwide who marched in protest of the Iraq war, meant that the billions who stayed home supported it.

I called that an either/or fallacy.

You proceeded to gum up the works with wisecracks about environmentalists and such.

If you can't argue facts, change the subject--your philosophy in a nutshell (woops, did that mention of "nut" and you in the same sentence constitute a personal attack?).