|
The W203 chassis is much more complex than the W124. With the introduction of multiple SRS systems, more sensors, etc. there are more things to go wrong. Unfortunately, some owners of later cars have been frustrated with CEL's and other maladies.
I think overall, though, the W203 is shaping up to be a fine car. Canadian reliability ratings have really improved for the W203 and MB seems to be sorting out the early cars and making on-going improvements to production.
Now, let's talk about the driving experience. I'm not a fan of the W203's gauge cluster as the speedo does not have a full needle and I find it difficult to glance at. The tach is small. Some of the switch gear feels a little "plastickier" than previous MB models.
But, the handling! It's dynamic in a way no W124 could ever be. Turn in response from both the suspension and the steering is light years ahead of the W124. At first the W203 seems overboosted in town, but after a couple miles you realize how intuitive the new rack and pinion really is.
The ACC/AC system is also light years ahead of the W124. I had a C320 loaner with the dual zone digital system and it was amazing in it's responsiveness and accuracy. I thought the dual zone system in the W210 was good, but the W203 is better yet.
A W203 makes better use of it's dimensions, offering more interior space for the size of the exterior.
Safety. Stop thinking "old is better" and "giant steel bumpers are good." The W203 is so much better in passive safety than the W124 it's startling. Mercedes is still a leader in this regard, and every year they do nothing but improve.
With respect to newer models, I would pick the W203 over any cars perhaps with the exception of the W211 E-Class. The W203 is a superb driving automobile.
|