Quote:
Originally posted by Joseph Bauers
Posted by Botnst: That's because only one of them has apparently betrayed the friendship of the other in public, to make an editorial point, to sell newspapers.
Aside from that, what's the big deal.
Protected species my a$$. I'll go after policy if you want to, I love criticizing that. When I say criticize, I mean in the analytic, not polemic sense. Polemics are okay I guess but its kind of unsurprising, uneducating, unpleasant and therefore, boring.
But the Cult of Hate crap is just too weird.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To criticize the work of a goverment official, when that is your job as a journalist, is not betraying a friendship. For you to assume Geyer's work is "polemical," not "analytical," is quite a leap. You've offered no evidence that you've actually read it.
Oh wait, you're the guy who can judge a movie without actually seeing it. That, I suppose, was your version of "analytical."
Joe B.
|
WTF should I offer you evidence of anything?
get real.
Did whatsername write the piece or Rummy?
Did she get paid or Rummy?
Did she claim friendship or Rummy.
Clown.
Bot