From what I have read the entire question of truth here revolves around the interpretation of one or two sentences. I have posted elsewhere on this forum Mr. Wilson's heated rebuttal to what looks like payback from the Republican dominated committee. Mr. Wilson is the one who blew the whole WMD thing wide open and exposed it for the hollow fraud that it has turned out to be, and he made major enemies in both the American and British Intelligence Services, who along with Bush would have gotten away with this fraud if he had kept his mouth shut. For that alone he deserves high praise. The unprecendented trumped up and non existent threats this administration used as an excuse to hijack 911 to pursue an Iraq war needed to be exposed.

There is still nothing that rises to the level of "proof" from any side. No shipment of uranium ever went anywhere, no money ever changed hands and no agreement was ever made. In the end, the same conclusion the 911 commission draws is still staring you in the face: Saddam was simply not a threat. This is just more of the grasp-at-any-straw baloney that is supposed to serve as justifcation for committing military mass murder on civilian populations in Iraq.