Ah! The newest rational. "Fired on coalition aircraft". Perhaps you can cite some dates and incidents. If memory serves me well, we've already had this argument, and it was found he stopped doing it in the mid-90s after we bombed the crap out of him.

I don't even know why you guys keep trying to argue this as if we actually had a case for invading this guy - we never did. The US Air Force and the UN weapon's inspectors had him tied up and beat him like a drum. Why don't you simply admit it for what it was, an oil grab?