I think they're going down the wrong path. The more complex and gadget/gimmick-oriented they make their cars, the worse their customer satisfaction ratings are going to be, and the more quality-control complaints they are going to get.
Things that last and stand the test of time are almost invariably simple, and made with quality materials....not complex, and not contracted out to the lowest bidder.
I think the company should concentrate a little less on being SO far ahead of the "cutting edge", and concentrate a little more effort on perfecting their existing technology, and improving fit, finish, durability, and materials quality. What good are all of those flashy bells and whistles if half of them end up not working properly in 5 years?....
I wouldn't own any Mercedes built after 1995, with the one possible exception of the G-Wagen.
I'd much rather have a car that's a few years behind when it comes to the newest technology, but that is reliable, durable, and easy to maintain. I guess this tendency is reflected in the list of cars that I own, eh?
Mike