Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aklim
He would be 10 mil richer and walk away without this hassle? Sounds like a clear cut case to me. If I didn't have my wife's interests at heart, I would take the money and wash my hands off the matter. If I did, I'd refuse it.
Lets say he takes the 10 mil and run. Well it confirms that he is out for the money. So??? He'd be 10 mil richer and no hassle and all you will have on him is that he is out for the money. Big deal. For 10 mil, I'll let you insult me any way you want.
|
My understanding is some medical experts say she has a chance at recovery.
Also, he may be suspected in foul play with her. A good reason for him not wanting her to recover. I dont understand his PASSION for having her die.
If he wants her dead, and even if money is part of his motive, he is gonna get lots of money one way or the other, so why not get the money, and have her dead, taking the money and keeping her alive makes him look guilty.
If she has NO CHANCE for recovery, why make her starve to death, a terrible way to die, why not just a lethal injection???
It cracks me up when the libs SCREAM, she has no chance for recovery, and they also SCREAM (and some university proffesors are SERIOUSLY trying to make this legal) that women should have thirty days, (some claim up to two years) AFTER birth to decide if they want to keep the baby, especially (and to be fair, some claim the ONLY time they can make this choice is..) IF the baby is seriously afflicted with a life crippliing disease.
Then they scream they want to use live embryos and tax money to fund stem cell research cuz it is gonna create all kinds of miracle cures for all kinds of maladies (like the ones they are claiming are incurable, hence its ok to kill the fetus or living born babies??)