View Single Post
  #12  
Old 04-18-2005, 03:14 PM
Duke2.6 Duke2.6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangofox007
I agree that the rear flex discs seem to last longer than the front. But a more robust design???
Compare them side by side. The front flex disk has much less torsional stiffness because it is designed to decouple the driveshaft from the transmission to isolate torsional vibration. As a result, the front disk flexes much more than the rear disk and this eventually causes the rubber to crank. The rear flex disk should outlast the front by at least two to one - maybe as high as four or five to one.

I just consider the front flex disk to be a 60K mile maintenance replacement item.

Duke
Reply With Quote