Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2004, 11:30 AM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
Pros and cons of converting '85 CA model W123 diesel to a fed version.

I have recently converted the intake and exhaust system on my '85 300D from a CA emissions version to a fed version. In the begininng it seemed like a fairly simple swap until I tried to install the fed air cleaner. You do need to use the intake & exhaust manifolds, turbo and aircleaner from the fed version in order to make it work properly. The intake & exhaust manifolds, turbo alone are not going to work with the CA air cleaner. It doesn't fit right. The fed air cleaner fits but you need to relocate the A/C lines and the turbo's oil line in order for it to fit right. I still haven't figured out how to install the oil tube that runs from the air cleaner back down to the oil pan so for now I have simply run a rubber line to an old oil bottle for it. It hasn't collected much oil yet. It seems there are many differences between the two models beyond just the intake & exhaust manifolds, turbo and aircleaner. I managed to get everything to fit by bending and rerouting the A/C lines but the entire job was a big PITA. I do have more power and better fuel economy now and plus I am rid of the oxidizing catalyst plus now I won't have to shell out the $30+ for the air filters and there seems to be much more room under the hood.
Would I do it again if I got a another '85 CA model?
Probably not.

__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012

Last edited by lietuviai; 09-01-2004 at 05:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2004, 12:35 AM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
Sorry to hear of your troubles. I guess the 123 is a little different. It was well worth it on my car. Of course, my catalyst had sprung a lead and it was either get a new one or try to weld it or do the swap. The job on my 126 wasn't really hard, just time consuming. I had another car at standby for parts also.
I did notice one thing that was peculiar. The oil tube you speak of that drains directly back down to the oil pan is absent on my car. I noticed it on the donor car but my car didn't have a hole for it.
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2004, 05:21 PM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
I didn't have the pipe at the start of the swap. I tried to fish it down to where it needs to go but I couldn't get it in. I haven't found the plug to where it needs to go anyway. I'll have to keep on eye on the oil bottle I have the hose running from the aircleaner for now.

__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page