![]() |
|
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
tire change recipe?
Quote:
![]() At 70 mph the tach reads 3200rpm. I'd like to aim for 3000 rpm @80mph. Is there a common MB wheel and good tire that will fit the '83 300cd I have, to achieve this? thanx Alberta Luthier |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Brian Carlton; 05-30-2006 at 08:52 AM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I think that this thread addresses the 123/126 differential interchangeability.
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=153435&highlight=2.47 Good Luck, Tom
__________________
1993 300TE 1984 300D 1984 300SD 1976 BMW R90S |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks for the info. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
sorting out the models rear ends (if my wife,
reads this title... Nah! not likely!
Thank you all for such a good response to my questions. rudolphgreen’s thread ‘holy 2.47 sleeper’ was informative but left me thirsting for the 2.47 In that thread, reiner and t walgamuth were saying a 247 came out of a 380 B.C. ‘The W126 diffs do fit the W123........just be sure that the W126 is 1985 or before.’ So If I have this right…. I can use a 2.47diff from a: 1980-85 W126 (does that mean an.SD? SDL? Or other models too? 1980-85 380?...gasser? Or perhaps a 2.88 from a 1985 300D? Have I got that part right? And are there any other years models for a 2.47 or 2.88 diff that will be easy for me to get the required parts from, and bolt up to my 83 300CD? Sorry if I seem a little dense, as I am newly afflicted I haven’t yet learned all the models.(and now while the wife is out of town I find myself studying models rear ends???) Thank you all for your patience and assistance. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You can't use the diff from any of the diesels from '81-'84 because they will have a 3.07. You could use the diff from the '85, which is a 2.88, but it appears that you'll prefer the 2.47 if you routinely go 80 mph. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I'll be curious to hear how drivable it is with a 2.47. I spend hours at 80 mph at 3500 rpm with my 3.07 and 205 tires. Lower rpm would be nice, but not at the expense of insufficient power to cruise up hills at highway speed. Personally, I don't think I would try to go any higher than 2.88 unless I had some info from someone who has done it first.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Here in the flatlands of Chicago, the 2.47 is manageable because the land is flat. My wife and I drove out to western Illinois yesterday, and when going up hill from a river valley on I-80 @ 65mph, the engine was a near maximum fueling (can't say full throttle) to maintain that speed. That was with the AC off; with it on I was loosing speed. In July we are driving east to Virginia; I'll report back how well it crosses the Appalachin Mountains. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The 2.47 is great for flatlands.........but........that's about it. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
My sentiments are the same as Brian's ie the 2.88 is the right gear set unless your driving across like Kansas all the time.
And the car should be a good running one too, with an ALDA tweak to get off the initial starting line, valves lashed properly and good injectors, etc. I'm running a 2.88 in my '83 300Dt and its great! I highly recommend going to a 2.88 in most cases. But, if I had to haul a bunch of people up hill a lot (around here we have some fairly steep hills) I'd probably have kept the 3.07
__________________
'95 E320 Wagon my favorite road car. '99 E300D wolf in sheeps body, '87 300D Sportline suspension, '79 300TD w/ 617.952 engine at 367,750 and counting! |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
2.47 versus 2.88
Quote:
Are there other models/years besides the 85 sd.sdl., that have a suitable 2.88? I'm hoping to locate one on this side of our border because shipping etc. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
http://www.adsitco.com/category.asp?CID=416 http://www.adsitco.com/category.asp?CID=418 BTW, this is not a recommendation for Adsitco, just some reference info. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
1985 300SD That's it. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|