Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-22-2006, 01:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1
buy or avoid 350SD's?

Howdy fellers... & gals. I'm new to the forum and the Columbus, OH area coming from TN and just getting into the MB diesel market. I was within a fraction of an inch to almost buying two 350SD's off ebay ( I know, dont laugh); as I like to sleep on things anymore before doing something impetuous (like buying my vettes), I was told by someone to avoid these 350 diesels like the plague and run away as fast as I could. The guy works for national diesel parts supplier so I figured he might know a little something I didnt. Since I"m new to this and dont really know if its legit to name names yet {and since i dont have his permission yet} I'll just hold off on that for now.... but this feller may have saved my hide. He says these rigs are well-known by the well-read, versed, and long-time mb owners as 'Rod-benders'. What say you, out there? Do I owe this guy a serious big-time thanks or case of beer? Now that its after-the-fact, it should have been pretty obvious that when
something is only made one-year [1991] that something is seriously wrong. Is that a fair assumption...at least in this case? Would there be any HD rod upgrades or other misc what-not out there to fix these engines and make them pretty sweet...oh yeh, and reliable? What do you folks think? Thanks for any advice or post.


Last edited by dbenz600g; 12-22-2006 at 02:09 AM. Reason: missspellings and sounded dumb
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2006, 02:25 AM
d.delano's Avatar
Dönerkebap
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 1,466
Yes, the rods bend in these, and it costs super big $$ to make them right. Avoid.
__________________
'02 BMW 325i
'85 300D 450k
'93 190E 2.6 170k(killed by tree)
'08 Ducati Hypermotard 1100S 6k
'06 Ducati S2R800 14k(sold)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2006, 02:52 AM
300SDog's Avatar
gimme a low-tech 240D
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: central ky
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Now that its after-the-fact, it should have been pretty obvious that when something is only made one-year [1991] that something is seriously wrong.
There you go - now you've got it...... When shopping for Mercedes Benz pick the model that changed the least over the greatest length of time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-22-2006, 03:16 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,932
the 350 was built beginning in 90 and was built through around 95 or so. it is the 603 engine displacing 3.5 liters,although in later years carried the designation of 300sd for some reason.

the purchase of one is to be entered into with great care. they are great driving cars when all is right though. and everything except the engine is pretty excellent and reliable and high quality.

the 3.0 liter version of the 603 is NOT known for bending rods and is fully interchangable with the 3.5 liter version.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2006, 04:04 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your best bet is to avoid the 91-95 300SD/350SD.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-22-2006, 09:17 AM
MarioCR's Avatar
'92 300 SD 200k
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Your best bet is to avoid the 91-95 300SD/350SD.
Yeah, good advice!
I have a 1992 300SD with 200K on it. For my little experience and, most, for what I read on the different forums on the net, any car with this age (or more) and mileage may have problems. Still, the 300SD is a great car, full of comfort and style. And top safety.
Whoever says that you have to avoid it, is because probably he doesn't know it. You can buy a 1991 300SD and have the double of problems you may have with a 1992 300SD.
Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-22-2006, 09:47 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,932
the 91 and 92 300sd both have the same motor.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-22-2006, 10:09 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbenz600g View Post
He says these rigs are well-known by the well-read, versed, and long-time mb owners as 'Rod-benders'. What say you, out there? Do I owe this guy a serious big-time thanks or case of beer?
Welcome to the forum.

You owe the guy a serious big-time thanks.......or a case of beer.

He potentially saved you $7,000.

If you wish to read for hours, do a search on "rod bender" on this forum. Many sorry stories for your perusal.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-22-2006, 10:23 AM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 14,324
I've got a friend that just picked up a '91 350SDL with 168k miles on it. Bought it for $6500 and to the uninformed is a beautiful, great driving and running car but it does have a poor rep. Anyway, for right now the car is fine. I just changed the gp's in it and checked for timing chain stretch and it is quite obvious that someone took great care of this car because it was absolutely spotless under the cam cover. It will be interesting to see how long it runs before the engine lives up to it's rep. He drives the heck out of it so it probably won't be long.

keep in mind:
Nothing is impossible to the uninformed.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-22-2006, 02:43 PM
MarioCR's Avatar
'92 300 SD 200k
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 18
A question:
who else (beside Sixto) had a bent rod on a CO603.971 ???
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-22-2006, 02:47 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
I think the 350SD is probably the best W126 diesel model to have. Its a throwable SWB version with all the nice updated stuff they got in 1989, plus a more powerfull engine. Thats if you can live with the engine, it may fail on you. Otherwise the car itself is great, one of the best.

Look for a 1986-87 300SDL. Same 603 a bit less torque, but they move right along.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-22-2006, 03:08 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarioCR View Post
A question:
who else (beside Sixto) had a bent rod on a CO603.971 ???


DslBnz or some such is the cats handle on here. He has a few that died.



I'd take a 350SDL no sweat and be ready to drop a 3.0L into one. You receive the updated interior, options, etc. I know of ONE 350SD '91 that I've ever seen... and between Dallas and Houston there are tons of vehicles. The motor took a dump in the 350, it was bought new in Dallas and is sitting at some repair shop.

It's black with a grey interior. About 298k on the ticker.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-22-2006, 03:13 PM
ncof300d
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have come to the conclussion that as far as Mercedes sedans go that I am not interested in anything made after the W126's, W123's, or W201's.

Last edited by ncof300d; 12-22-2006 at 03:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-22-2006, 03:18 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Well in that case the best W126's to buy are the updated 1989-91 versions. Better sound system, interior, some had traction control ect.

They had a lot better sound systems, you can upgrade the speakers with some good ones, throw in a couple real high end amps and have a system as good as any in a modern car.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-22-2006, 04:18 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarioCR View Post
A question:
who else (beside Sixto) had a bent rod on a CO603.971 ???
Jim Smith, one of the moderators of DD, had one.

There was a fellow outside of Boston who had one. It was a beautiful vehicle with a bad engine. A few years ago he got about $5K for it.

There are others.............

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page