![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
That isn't true. Diesel is batch tested before it ever leaves the refinery.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
My $0.02 as a refinery engineer.
The ULSD meets the same lub spec as LSD did. The difference is that ULSD will be additized to just meet spec. LSD easily exceeded the spec with no additive. ULSD lubricity should be just fine. LSD lubricity was better than just fine.
__________________
1982 300TD 279K. 1984 190D 5sp 265K |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The article is Star magazine, Jul/Aug 2007 'New Diesel Fuel and Old Diesels" by George Murphy pp 84-86 The article had great information about how the junk they are selling as ULSD does not meet the minimum lubrication requirements for even new engines much less our old ones. "Of 27 countries surveyed, only Canada, Switzerland, Poland and Taiwan have worse diesel fuel than the US." There was a grid in the article that showed lubricity levels in various cities. If I remember correctly, only one city came close to the minimum standard. I wish the article was available online so I could link to it, but STAR does not post articles. According to the article MB likes Lucas fuel treatment and Octal OLI-9070 as lubricity enhancers. They also like B5 BioD but not a higher percentage. If the stuff coming from the refineries meets the standard, what is happening before it reaches the pump? Can the lubricity agent be precipitating out of the fuel? Do what you want, but I will stay safe and keep adding Lucas to my tank!
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy" Current Monika '74 450 SL BrownHilda '79 280SL FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee Krystal 2004 Volvo S60 Gone '74 Jeep CJ5 '97 Jeep ZJ Laredo Rudolf ‘86 300SDL Bruno '81 300SD Fritzi '84 BMW '92 Subaru '96 Impala SS '71 Buick GS conv '67 GTO conv '63 Corvair conv '57 Nomad ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Well I stand corrected. I didn't know it was that bad.
The diesel is not in spec leaving the refinery. The additive is added at the fuel terminals. Terminals generally don't have a full lab and 15 chemical engineers on staff, and I've seen some interesting things happen at terminals that you wouldn't see at refineries just from the lack of technical expertise. The additive is also very expensive so I can guarantee that only the minimum amount is put in. What was just good enough today may not be good enough tomorrow. I have no idea what kind of testing the terminals do on this. I saw a presentation from an additive provider a few years ago. He had a chart showing a ppm addition vs. % fuel meeting lub spec. It implied that you chose what percent of your diesel you wanted to be in spec and added x ppm. That's pretty messed up. There are no other fuel specs that are negotiable that I'm aware of.
__________________
1982 300TD 279K. 1984 190D 5sp 265K |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
API gravity CETANE Distillation Copper Strip Color CONDUCTIVITY VISCOSITY @40C DOCTOR TEST SULFUR FLASHPOINT HAZE POUR POINT CLOUD POINT
__________________
1982 300TD 279K. 1984 190D 5sp 265K |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|